<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Health and Science Twitter &amp; Blog Top 50 and 100 Lists. How to Separate the Wheat from the Chaff.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/2012/04/24/health-and-science-twitter-blog-top-50-and-100-lists-how-to-separate-the-wheat-from-the-chaff/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/2012/04/24/health-and-science-twitter-blog-top-50-and-100-lists-how-to-separate-the-wheat-from-the-chaff/</link>
	<description>A medical librarians exploration of the web 2.0 world and beyond.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 May 2013 09:27:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Silly Sunday #52 Online Education Sites: and the Spam Goes on. &#171; Laika&#039;s MedLibLog</title>
		<link>http://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/2012/04/24/health-and-science-twitter-blog-top-50-and-100-lists-how-to-separate-the-wheat-from-the-chaff/#comment-10458</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Silly Sunday #52 Online Education Sites: and the Spam Goes on. &#171; Laika&#039;s MedLibLog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2012 22:31:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/?p=13106#comment-10458</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] many occasions  (here, here, here and here [1-4), I have warned against top 50 and 100 lists made by online education sites, [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] many occasions  (here, here, here and here [1-4), I have warned against top 50 and 100 lists made by online education sites, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Even the Scientific American Blog Links to Spammy Online Education Affiliate Sites&#8230; &#171; Laika&#039;s MedLibLog</title>
		<link>http://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/2012/04/24/health-and-science-twitter-blog-top-50-and-100-lists-how-to-separate-the-wheat-from-the-chaff/#comment-9509</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Even the Scientific American Blog Links to Spammy Online Education Affiliate Sites&#8230; &#171; Laika&#039;s MedLibLog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 15:09:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/?p=13106#comment-9509</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] numerous occasions [1,2,3] I have warned against top Twitter and Blog lists spread by education affiliate sites. Sites [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] numerous occasions [1,2,3] I have warned against top Twitter and Blog lists spread by education affiliate sites. Sites [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: laikaspoetnik</title>
		<link>http://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/2012/04/24/health-and-science-twitter-blog-top-50-and-100-lists-how-to-separate-the-wheat-from-the-chaff/#comment-9503</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[laikaspoetnik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 09:44:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/?p=13106#comment-9503</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Unfortunately David, you&#039;re one of the few people who sees through this.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately David, you&#8217;re one of the few people who sees through this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sciencebase</title>
		<link>http://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/2012/04/24/health-and-science-twitter-blog-top-50-and-100-lists-how-to-separate-the-wheat-from-the-chaff/#comment-9270</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sciencebase]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 09:06:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/?p=13106#comment-9270</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I get endless emails from people with these kinds of sites telling me I am on such and such a list...I even get different messages claiming to be from different people, but actually the same email address. They&#039;re splogs and link bait scams almost always and unfortunately some people get suckered into linking to them, giving them credence and publicity. They&#039;re a pain in the &#039;arris.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I get endless emails from people with these kinds of sites telling me I am on such and such a list&#8230;I even get different messages claiming to be from different people, but actually the same email address. They&#8217;re splogs and link bait scams almost always and unfortunately some people get suckered into linking to them, giving them credence and publicity. They&#8217;re a pain in the &#8216;arris.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: laikaspoetnik</title>
		<link>http://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/2012/04/24/health-and-science-twitter-blog-top-50-and-100-lists-how-to-separate-the-wheat-from-the-chaff/#comment-9176</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[laikaspoetnik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 01:45:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/?p=13106#comment-9176</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi AnneMarie. You are right about the list. In itself it is a good list,(3-4-5) and it has added value. At least it gives a real description of the tweople and their tweets. The author is on Twitter (&quot;she writes a lot&quot;)  and apparently a bit familiar to the field. For me it is sufficient to avoid lists if the list is published on a site fulfilling criterion 2. thedegree360.onlinedegrees.com typically belongs to the online degrees websites (how many of these copycats are there?) 
Criteria 2.1-4 all apply.

These &quot;blogposts&quot; have many different authors (I have been approached by many for guestposts and links -not only to lists), some good, some not so good. It is the intention of the site that worries me the most.

I could not explain it better than Ellie  &lt;a href=&quot;http://ellieheartslibraries.wordpress.com/2009/08/06/affiliate-sites/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Here I quot her once again&lt;/a&gt;:

&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:left;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color:#333399;&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Both this site (http://associatedegree.org) and &lt;span style=&quot;color:#ff6600;&quot;&gt;Learn-gasm &lt;/span&gt;– who has the top 100 blogs post going around currently (www. bachelorsdegreeonline. com) &lt;span style=&quot;color:#ff0000;&quot;&gt;are sites designed solely to earn revenue through click-throughs.&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color:#333399;&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;The “bachelorsdegreeonline” at the end &lt;span style=&quot;color:#ff0000;&quot;&gt;is a tracking mechanism to allow collegedegrees.com to reward sites that send them visitors.
&lt;/span&gt;While all the schools linked to are legitimate schools, both are misleading sites since they&lt;span style=&quot;color:#ff0000;&quot;&gt; &lt;strong&gt;only &lt;/strong&gt;link to schools that offer an affiliate kickback. &lt;/span&gt;They also only link to forms to enter your contact information at third party sites, not to the actual school websites.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/span&gt;

&lt;span style=&quot;color:#ff0000;&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;While the content of the top 100 blogs and 25 predictions lists is completely non-objectionable, the fact that librarians are taking these sites seriously is.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/span&gt;

&lt;span style=&quot;color:#333399;&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;What the author is doing is trying to increase his traffic and &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Search_engine_optimization&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;SEO&lt;/a&gt;. He likely does some minimal investigation to determine what sites would have the biggest impact – so in that sense, the lists are probably somewhat representational of influential sites – like I said, the content isn’t the objectional part. &lt;span style=&quot;color:#ff0000;&quot;&gt;He creates the page with the links to the 100 top whatever, then emails all of them to let them know they’re on the list. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color:#ff0000;&quot;&gt;Every one of them that posts that they’ve made a top 100 list and links back to him increases his site’s page ranking. &lt;/span&gt;The more important your site is, the more it helps him, both in search engine algorithm terms (being linked to by someplace important counts for more than being linked to from less popular sites) and because it brings him more incoming traffic. &lt;span style=&quot;color:#ff0000;&quot;&gt;Which also increases his site’s page ranking (and the chance of someone clicking through in a way that gets him paid).&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/span&gt;

&lt;span style=&quot;color:#ff0000;&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;...&lt;strong&gt;But, this particular little batch of sites that is currently targeting higher education – they are ones that are ostensibly trying to help people find colleges, choose degrees, etc., when in fact they are only linking to forms to enter your contact information for a small subset of online only colleges that offer affiliate linking programs.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:left;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color:#333399;&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;...on the surface they seem related to education, some have .org addresses, but when we start looking at them critically they fail every test easily – &lt;span style=&quot;color:#ff0000;&quot;&gt;no about page (or at least nothing informative on it), unauthored posts,&#160; little to no original content. One of the main components of being a librarian is teaching people to think critically about information, so when we fail to do so ourselves I find it incredibly frustrating&lt;/span&gt;.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi AnneMarie. You are right about the list. In itself it is a good list,(3-4-5) and it has added value. At least it gives a real description of the tweople and their tweets. The author is on Twitter (&#8220;she writes a lot&#8221;)  and apparently a bit familiar to the field. For me it is sufficient to avoid lists if the list is published on a site fulfilling criterion 2. thedegree360.onlinedegrees.com typically belongs to the online degrees websites (how many of these copycats are there?)<br />
Criteria 2.1-4 all apply.</p>
<p>These &#8220;blogposts&#8221; have many different authors (I have been approached by many for guestposts and links -not only to lists), some good, some not so good. It is the intention of the site that worries me the most.</p>
<p>I could not explain it better than Ellie  <a href="http://ellieheartslibraries.wordpress.com/2009/08/06/affiliate-sites/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Here I quot her once again</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p style="text-align:left;"><span style="color:#333399;"><em>Both this site (<a href="http://associatedegree.org" rel="nofollow">http://associatedegree.org</a>) and <span style="color:#ff6600;">Learn-gasm </span>– who has the top 100 blogs post going around currently (www. bachelorsdegreeonline. com) <span style="color:#ff0000;">are sites designed solely to earn revenue through click-throughs.</span><br />
</em></span></p>
</blockquote>
<blockquote><p><span style="color:#333399;"><em>The “bachelorsdegreeonline” at the end <span style="color:#ff0000;">is a tracking mechanism to allow collegedegrees.com to reward sites that send them visitors.<br />
</span>While all the schools linked to are legitimate schools, both are misleading sites since they<span style="color:#ff0000;"> <strong>only </strong>link to schools that offer an affiliate kickback. </span>They also only link to forms to enter your contact information at third party sites, not to the actual school websites.</em></span></p>
<p><span style="color:#ff0000;"><em>While the content of the top 100 blogs and 25 predictions lists is completely non-objectionable, the fact that librarians are taking these sites seriously is.</em></span></p>
<p><span style="color:#333399;"><em>What the author is doing is trying to increase his traffic and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Search_engine_optimization" rel="nofollow">SEO</a>. He likely does some minimal investigation to determine what sites would have the biggest impact – so in that sense, the lists are probably somewhat representational of influential sites – like I said, the content isn’t the objectional part. <span style="color:#ff0000;">He creates the page with the links to the 100 top whatever, then emails all of them to let them know they’re on the list. </span><span style="color:#ff0000;">Every one of them that posts that they’ve made a top 100 list and links back to him increases his site’s page ranking. </span>The more important your site is, the more it helps him, both in search engine algorithm terms (being linked to by someplace important counts for more than being linked to from less popular sites) and because it brings him more incoming traffic. <span style="color:#ff0000;">Which also increases his site’s page ranking (and the chance of someone clicking through in a way that gets him paid).</span></em></span></p>
<p><span style="color:#ff0000;"><em>&#8230;<strong>But, this particular little batch of sites that is currently targeting higher education – they are ones that are ostensibly trying to help people find colleges, choose degrees, etc., when in fact they are only linking to forms to enter your contact information for a small subset of online only colleges that offer affiliate linking programs.</strong></em></span></p>
<p style="text-align:left;"><span style="color:#333399;"><em>&#8230;on the surface they seem related to education, some have .org addresses, but when we start looking at them critically they fail every test easily – <span style="color:#ff0000;">no about page (or at least nothing informative on it), unauthored posts,&nbsp; little to no original content. One of the main components of being a librarian is teaching people to think critically about information, so when we fail to do so ourselves I find it incredibly frustrating</span>.</em></span></p>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AnneMarie Cunningham (@amcunningham)</title>
		<link>http://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/2012/04/24/health-and-science-twitter-blog-top-50-and-100-lists-how-to-separate-the-wheat-from-the-chaff/#comment-9168</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AnneMarie Cunningham (@amcunningham)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 07:33:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laikaspoetnik.wordpress.com/?p=13106#comment-9168</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hello
Many thanks for this. I didn&#039;t spot that the medical professors list was spammy and I should be good at this. To be fair they did add additional content etc.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello<br />
Many thanks for this. I didn&#8217;t spot that the medical professors list was spammy and I should be good at this. To be fair they did add additional content etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
