In Beyond the book* you can hear the First Research Blogging Awards announced (see post).
Here are the podcast and the transcript of the live interview with the Award organizers Dave Munger of ResearchBlogging.org and Joy Moore of Seed Media.
Dave and Joy talk about blogs in the research space and the reasons behind some of the winners, which include Not Exactly Rocket Science, Epiphenom, BPS Research Digest and Culturing Science.
In the interview Dave and Joy not only talk about the winners but also discuss why it is important that science bloggers write about peer review and form a community. It is also meant “to give people the broader picture about the state of research blogging today online and how all of this is helping to promote science and science literacy and culture throughout the world.”
Two Excerpts from the Transcripts by Moore (which highlights why research blogging is important:
(…..) and what we’re seeing, and it’s quite exciting, is that bloggers, scientist bloggers around the world are putting a lot of very, very thoughtful effort into spontaneously writing about peer reviewed research in a way that is very similar to what you’ll see in say the news and views sections of some of the top science journals. And so what we’re able to see is not only a broader spectrum of coverage of peer reviewed research and interpretation, but we’re also seeing the immediate accessibility to that interpretation through the blogs and it’s open and it’s free and so it’s really opening up the accessibility to views and interpretations of research in a way that we’ve never seen before.
(…..) One of the most critical aspects of being not only a scientist, but also a blogger is ensuring that you get your work out there and you have recognition and attribution for it and therefore, to continue to encourage the Research Blogging activity, we feel that we can help play a role by ensuring that the bloggers are recognized for their work.